Overview

Jing An Hotel

370 Huashan Road, Shanghai 200040, China
+86 216 248 0088

S$ 105+

Overall guest ratings

7.9/10 Good
based on 4,784 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.4
  • 9.3
  • 4.9
  • 4.7

Good to know

  • Friendly atmosphere
  • Good accessibility by car

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Jin Jiang Jing An Hotel puts you within a 10-minute drive of Jing An Temple and French Concession. Guests can indulge in massages, and The Madrid restaurant, one of 2 restaurants, serves breakfast, lunch, and dinner. A bar/lounge and a health club are other highlights, and rooms at this upscale hotel offer LCD TVs and minibars.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Wi-Fi
    • Fitness centre
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Car hire
    • Babysitting or child care
    • Business centre
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Gift shop
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Room service
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Beauty salon
    • Express check out
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Sauna
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Concierge service
    • Coffee shop
    • Internet (surcharge)
    • Pets not allowed
    • Storage available
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    8.2 Excellent
    based on 5,089 reviews
    • 9.4 "Incredible bar."
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      9.7 "97% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 6.2 "Service is ok."
      5.5 "Only 55% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.9 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.7 "Not very comfortable."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were small."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 90%."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      4.6 "54% said rooms were small."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.3 "87% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 90%."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.0 "80% found problems with the furniture."
      4.8 "52% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.8 "92% had problems with the shower."
    • 3.8 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.3 Good
    based on 203 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
    • 5.7 "Service is ok."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.2 "98% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall rating

    8.1 Excellent
    based on 763 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
    • 5.9 "Service is ok."
      5.7 "Only 57% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.7 "Not very comfortable."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were small."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were small."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.2 "98% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.3 "87% thought it was overpriced."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    8.0 Good
    based on 3,664 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.2 "Near to public transport, according to 82%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 9.4 "Incredible bar."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
      5.3 "Only 53% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 5.0 "Breakfast is mediocre."
      4.9 "51% said the breakfast was too expensive."
    • 4.6 "Not very comfortable."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      1.3 "87% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "87% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 85%."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.5 "55% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.0 "80% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.6 Good
    based on 458 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Easily accessible by car, said 99%."
      8.4 "Near to public transport, according to 84%."
    • 6.2 "Service is ok."
      6.0 "Only 60% found the staff to be friendly enough."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      0.4 "For 96%, the rooms looked old."
      1.3 "87% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.8 "92% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.5 "95% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.3 "Disappointing internet connection."
      0.8 "92% said the wifi quality was bad."
      1.5 "85% thought it was overpriced."
    Hotel type
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Friendly atmosphere"
    "Good accessibility by car"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention
    More
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close