Overview

Hostal Lis

Escarpin, 10, 41004 Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain
+34 954 213 088

S$ 38+

Overall guest ratings

6.5/10 Good
based on 899 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.8
  • 4.1
  • 3.9
  • 3.1

Nearby

    show all

    About

    With a privileged setting right in the historic centre of Seville, the Lis Guest House offers comfortable accommodation at low rates in the charming Andalusian capital city. It is ideal for budget travellers visiting Seville, that will reach on foot major attractions and monuments, like the Gothic Cathedral, the Jewish Quarter, or the city's bullring. The establishment occupies a stylish 18th century mansion, totally renovated to guarantee the maximum comfort. The building features a typical central patio decorated with flowers and original tiles, creating a quiet and peaceful atmosphere that will make you feel like home. Moreover, the Guest House features a solarium, where you will be able to sunbathe during the warm spring days. The Lis Guest House offers its guests a series of useful services, including a public phone, 24 hour reception desk and free wireless Internet access. Friendly staff will always be pleased to assist you, providing you with maps and information about the city, and helping you get tickets to a flamenco show at the Palacio Andaluz, a cruise on the Guadalquivir River or a guided visit on the tourist bus.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Facilities for disabled guests
    • Internet
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    based on 893 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 4.1 "Not very clean."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      4.8 "52% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.9 "Service is below average."
      2.7 "73% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      1.8 "Bad housekeeping, according to 82%."
      2.3 "77% thought the service was unprofessional."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.5 "85% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.3 "77% had problems with the shower."
      4.1 "59% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.8 "92% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.7 "For 93%, the rooms looked old."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
      4.8 "52% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.1 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.7 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.5 "85% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."
      0.8 "92% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 598 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 4.4 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
    • 4.3 "Service is below average."
      3.3 "67% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.0 "90% said rooms were small."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      2.1 "79% had problems with the shower."
      4.2 "58% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.6 "94% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."
      0.7 "For 93%, the rooms looked old."
      1.1 "89% found problems with the furniture."
    • 2.5 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.4 "66% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.0 "90% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."
      0.6 "94% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 53 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
    • 6.0 "Average amenities."
      5.7 "57% thought the building was acceptable."
    • 4.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
    • 4.0 "Service is below average."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
    • 2.7 "Quite uncomfortable."

    Overall rating

    6.2 Good
    based on 241 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
    • 4.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      4.7 "53% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.7 "Service is below average."
      2.6 "74% indicated the reception staff was not good."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      3.2 "68% complained about the bathroom."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      2.2 "78% had problems with the shower."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      1.2 "88% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.2 "58% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.7 "53% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      3.6 "64% thought it was too noisy."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.2 "88% criticized the small bathroom."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:

    Photos
    Map

    Map