Overview

Hotel Max

Via Gioberti 30, 00185 Rome, Lazio, Italy
+39 064 470 3315

S$ 95+

Overall guest ratings

7.8/10 Good
based on 1,609 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.6
  • 9.2
  • 7.0
  • 4.7

Good to know

  • Clean rooms
  • Train station is close

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Hotel Max puts you in a great location, within just a 10-minute walk of Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore and Teatro dell'Opera di Roma. Guests will have free perks like breakfast and WiFi. Flat-screen TVs, minibars, and room service are offered in all rooms.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Bicycle hire
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry service
    • No smoking
    • Babysitting/child care services (surcharge)
    • Pets not allowed
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    7.8 Good
    based on 1,609 reviews
    • 9.6 "World class service."
      10.0 "100% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.5 "95% said the reception staff was great."
      9.4 "94% thought the service was very professional."
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
      10.0 "100% were happy with the price of the breakfast."
      10.0 "100% thought it was a great value."
      10.0 "100% were happy with the price."
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.1 "91% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      7.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 77%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 7.6 "Good cleanliness."
      8.2 "82% said rooms were clean."
    • 7.0 "Internet works."
      10.0 "100% thought it was a great value."
    • 7.0 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were small."
      3.5 "65% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "98% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.7 "83% had problems with the shower."
      1.9 "81% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.6 "For 74%, the rooms looked old."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      1.4 "86% found problems with the furniture."
      2.3 "77% were unhappy with the view."
      2.0 "80% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 3.2 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were small."
      3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."
      0.2 "98% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
    • 3.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.9 "81% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.2 "For 78%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.5 "65% complained about the elevator."
      0.5 "95% thought the facilities needed updating."
      2.2 "For 78%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      3.6 "64% found the grounds unpleasant."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.7 Good
    based on 1,110 reviews
    • 9.6 "World class service."
      10.0 "100% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.4 "94% said the reception staff was great."
      9.2 "92% thought the service was very professional."
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 7.3 "Internet works."
      10.0 "100% thought it was a great value."
    • 7.0 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% complained about the bathroom."
      2.1 "79% had problems with the shower."
      0.1 "99% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      2.1 "For 79%, the rooms looked old."
      1.9 "81% found problems with the furniture."
      2.6 "74% were unhappy with the view."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were small."
      3.4 "66% thought it was too noisy."
      0.1 "99% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.1 "For 79%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
      3.3 "67% complained about the elevator."
    • 2.7 "Horrible vibe."
      1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.1 "For 79%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.6 Good
    based on 96 reviews
    • 9.6 "World class service."
      10.0 "100% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.3 "93% said the reception staff was great."
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 7.7 "Good cleanliness."
      8.3 "83% said rooms were clean."
    • 7.3 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."
      1.7 "83% said rooms were small."
      3.4 "66% complained about the bathroom."
    • 3.2 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.7 "83% said rooms were small."
    • 2.9 "Horrible vibe."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    7.9 Good
    based on 402 reviews
    • 9.8 "World class service."
      10.0 "100% found the staff to be very friendly."
      9.6 "96% said the reception staff was great."
      9.5 "95% thought the service was very professional."
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 7.4 "Good cleanliness."
      8.1 "81% said rooms were clean."
    • 7.1 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.5 "Internet is average."
      5.5 "55% thought the wifi quality was ok."
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."
      3.6 "64% complained about the bathroom."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were small."
      1.7 "83% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.5 "85% had problems with the shower."
      3.1 "For 69%, the rooms looked old."
      0.3 "97% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.2 "88% found problems with the furniture."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
    • 3.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.4 "76% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      2.9 "71% thought it was too noisy."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were small."
      0.3 "97% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.4 "66% complained about the elevator."
      0.7 "93% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Romantic Hotel
    Guests say the hotel is perfect for a romantic getaway.
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to know
    "Clean rooms"
    "Train station is close"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close