Overview
×
Your browser will soon be unsupported by KAYAK.
Update now and keep on travelling with us!

Residencial Porto Novo

Rua Alexandre Herculano, 185, 4000 Porto, Porto, Portugal
+351 222 055 739

S$ 26+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
based on 1,544 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.2
  • 4.6
  • 4.6
  • 4.4

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Situated right in the heart of the buzzing Biaxa or downtown area, the Residencial Porto Novo offers affordable Porto accommodation within walking distance of all of Porto's main tourist attractions, such as the Ribeira district and the port wine cellars in the Vila Nova de Gaia neighbourhood, where you can sample or buy a bottle of the dessert wine that has made Porto famous all over the world. The Residencial Porto Novo is a comfortable and low-cost place to stay in Porto City Centre, which is ideal for a cheap weekend away or a short holiday. You can park on the streets around this small and cosy Porto guesthouse, which also has a small bar for refreshments just by the reception desk. As well as saving money on accommodation, you can also save on internet access since this discount Porto guesthouse has an Internet Point that is free for guests to use. If your budget will not stretch to eating out every night, then you can prepare simple meals in the guesthouse's kitchen, which has a microwave, fridge and a kettle. Please note that you can pay by cash only.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    AMENITIES

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Business centre
    • Internet
    • Bar/Lounge
    • 24 hour front desk
    • Storage available
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 1,544 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.2 "City centre within easy reach, said 92%."
      9.1 "Near to public transport, according to 91%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.6 "Bad amenities."
      4.6 "54% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 4.6 "Disappointing food."
    • 4.4 "Not very clean."
      3.7 "63% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.7 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      1.6 "84% thought it was too noisy."
      0.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 91%."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.5 "Awful rooms."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      2.8 "72% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.1 "79% had problems with the shower."
      0.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 91%."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.9 "81% found problems with the furniture."
      1.6 "84% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      0.0 "100% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.9 Good
    based on 1,049 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.2 "City centre within easy reach, said 92%."
      9.3 "Near to public transport, according to 93%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
      8.7 "87% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.8 "Disappointing food."
    • 4.3 "Not very clean."
      3.7 "63% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.1 "Bad amenities."
      4.0 "60% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.9 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      1.9 "81% thought it was too noisy."
      1.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 88%."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 2.5 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      3.7 "63% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were small."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.1 "79% had problems with the shower."
      0.5 "For 95%, the rooms looked old."
      1.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 88%."
      2.0 "80% found problems with the furniture."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 200 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.3 "City centre within easy reach, said 93%."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 3.9 "Not very clean."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.3 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.6 "84% thought it was too noisy."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
    • 2.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.6 "84% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.0 "Awful rooms."
      3.1 "69% said rooms were small."
      1.7 "83% complained about the bathroom."
      2.9 "71% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
    • 1.2 "Horrible vibe."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    6.8 Good
    based on 293 reviews
    • 8.8 "Location is great."
      8.8 "Near to public transport, according to 88%."
      8.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 87%."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.2 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      3.3 "67% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.8 "Awful rooms."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      2.6 "74% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.3 "67% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.7 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.6 "74% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% thought it was too noisy."
      0.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 92%."
    • 1.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.2 "88% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.8 "Horrible vibe."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Economy Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for budget travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    More
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?
    Close