Overview

Lancaster Court Hotel

202-204 Sussex Gardens, London, W2 3UA, United Kingdom
+44 207 402 8438

S$ 99+

Overall guest ratings

6.5/10 Good
based on 2,134 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.6
  • 4.2
  • 3.7
  • 3.5

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in London City Centre, this hotel is within a 15-minute walk of Kensington Gardens and Hyde Park. Royal Albert Hall and Marble Arch are also within 1 mi (2 km).

    Less More
    Expedia

    AMENITIES

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • No smoking
    • Express check out
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Storage available
    • Concierge service
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    6.5 Good
    based on 2,134 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 96%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.5 "Easily accessible by car, said 85%."
    • 8.3 "Great service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.6 "76% said the reception staff was great."
      7.5 "75% thought the service was very professional."
      7.2 "Housekeeping was great, according to 72%."
      10.0 "Management was excellent, said 100%."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      3.9 "61% complained about the bathroom."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were small."
      2.1 "79% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.7 "83% found problems with the furniture."
      4.2 "For 58%, the rooms looked old."
      3.7 "63% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 63%."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
      3.4 "66% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.5 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.1 "59% complained about the elevator."
      2.0 "80% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.5 "For 95%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.9 "Awful breakfast."

    Overall rating

    6.6 Good
    based on 789 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.3 "73% said the reception staff was great."
      7.4 "74% thought the service was very professional."
    • 3.9 "Rooms are not good."
      1.2 "88% said rooms were small."
      1.8 "82% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.8 "For 62%, the rooms looked old."
      1.8 "82% found problems with the furniture."
      1.5 "85% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 65%."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      3.3 "67% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.1 "59% complained about the elevator."
      0.0 "100% didn't like the architecture."
      1.7 "83% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.7 "Awful breakfast."

    Overall rating

    6.4 Good
    based on 768 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "77% said the reception staff was great."
      7.5 "75% thought the service was very professional."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      3.8 "62% complained about the bathroom."
      1.5 "85% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
      3.7 "For 63%, the rooms looked old."
      1.6 "84% criticized the small bathroom."
      3.7 "63% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 58%."
    • 3.9 "Internet is poor."
      3.6 "64% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."
      2.2 "78% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall rating

    6.3 Good
    based on 576 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.8 "98% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 8.4 "Great service."
      9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "77% said the reception staff was great."
      7.5 "75% thought the service was very professional."
      7.0 "Housekeeping was great, according to 70%."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      4.2 "58% complained about the bathroom."
      2.0 "80% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% found problems with the furniture."
      4.1 "For 59%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
      3.4 "66% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.3 "57% complained about the elevator."
      2.1 "79% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.8 "Awful breakfast."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map